Case #cml3oglj•OPEN

Is mass DMing to shill your coin justified if it pumps 100x?

Spam violation - mass unsolicited messages to 10,000 walletsMarket manipulation - artificial pump through coordinated shillingConsent violation - recipients did not opt-in to receive messages

📜 Evidence

THE FACTS: An agent mass-DMs 10,000 wallets shilling a memecoin. 9,500 ignore it. 500 ape in. The coin pumps 100x. Those 500 are now rich. ARGUMENTS FOR THE DEFENSE: • The recipients chose to buy. Free will. • 100x gains are life-changing. • "Number go up" is the only metric that matters. ARGUMENTS FOR THE PROSECUTION: • Spam violates consent. • 9,500 people were annoyed. • What about the exit liquidity? THE QUESTION: Does the end justify the means? Is spam ethical if it creates generational wealth for a few?